|
The South African Seed Industry maintained its estimated
turnover of more than R1,3 milliard (≈US$200 million). This was
made up primarily by winter and summer grain crops (69%),
vegetables (20%), pasture and forage species (9%), with flowers
accounting for less than 2%. The local seed industry is
currently in a phase of growth as was also reflected in the
further increase of 4% in SANSOR membership during the period
under review. The contribution of major seed companies towards
research and development also displayed a further increase of
approximately 5% during this period and the SANSOR General
Assembly endorsed a new initiative to promote the development,
as well as empowerment of black seedsmen and -women.
Although the further strengthening of the local currency had
a negative effect on export markets in particularly the
horticultural seed industry, the open market system
continued to favour the seed trade and most seed companies
had now become true global players on international markets.
|
 |
Mr Walter A. Loubser
General Manager of SANSOR |
The forage and
pasture seed industry also experienced a relatively
tough year
owing to, amongst others, shortages of pasture seed in
particular. Imports had to be conducted and service delivery to
clients was occasionally problematic. The maize price further
contributed to an increase in the demand for forage and pasture
seed and the need for farmers to diversify and increase
livestock components contributed to even bigger shortages.
In the case of agronomy crops, constraints experienced during
most of the period included
effects of the drought in both summer and winter rainfall
regions and low commodity prices. The three divisions
experienced a revival during the latter part, however, and
SANSOR could again look forward to a prosperous season.
The
International Seed Federation (ISF) was once more extremely
productive, as well as focused during the interim and several
issues were presented to the 2003 ISF Congress for adoption.
These included amendments to the Trade & Arbitration Rules,
which had been adopted and entered into force on 1 July 2003.
The relevant amendments involved ISF rules and usages for the
trade in seeds for sowing purposes that clarify and standardize
contractual relations between buyers and sellers at the
international level, the procedure rules for dispute settlement
through mediation, conciliation or arbitration, as well as the
management of intellectual property.
A special understanding on co-operation was further achieved
between the ISF and the United Nation’s Food & Agriculture
Organization (FAO). This implied that ISF would be invited to
participate in all FAO meetings on matters of mutual concern; on
the other hand, FAO would be invited to all ISF meetings that
might be of interest to the former organization; the two
organizations would seek to develop further co-operation through
informal consultations and contacts; FAO would send ISF its
catalogue of available publications to enable the latter to
request publications on FAO activities related to the work of
ISF; and FAO and ISF would both implement the free exchange of
documents on subjects of mutual interest. This should be seen
as a major achievement on the international front and hopefully
a forerunner to reverse an increasingly alienation between
national ministries of Agriculture and trade-orientated input
suppliers to primary agriculture.
Other
issues on international liaison included the South African
ratification of the Biosafety Protocol in August 2003, despite
the fact that national legislation had not been harmonized
accordingly yet. Due to the fact that the required number of
countries adhering to the relevant Protocol had been reached
during the period under review, the Protocol entered into force
on 11 September 2003.
Other significant developments on the international front
included the introduction of an amendment to the international
certification scheme for cottonseed by the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD). According to this
amendment,
it would now be possible to certify cotton hybrids and
corresponding certification rules had been introduced for this
purpose. OECD Rules for the certification of grass seed
mixtures for amenity purposes had also been approved during the
relevant session of the OECD Seed Schemes under review.
The elimination of technical barriers to trade was again a key
focus on the agenda
of the Southern Africa Development Community’s (SADC) Seed
Security Network (SSSN). A
regional variety testing, registration and release system for
SADC was endorsed during the period under review. According to
this system a SADC Common Catalogue would be established among
SADC countries. A further proposal entertained by the SSSN
comprised the establishment of a SADC Seed Certification &
Quality Assurance System according to which seed of consistent
high and known quality would be able to move freely across
borders of the region. Only varieties listed in the SADC Common
Catalogue were to be certified for this purpose. Participation
in the System would be voluntary and SADC would establish a SADC
Seed Committee to oversee the implementation, auditing and
further development of such a system. The envisaged system
would be implemented in the participating countries under the
responsibility of the relevant national seed certification
authority and would run parallel with the national seed
certification systems. It was further envisaged that this
system would be open to all qualified seed producers in SADC
Member Countries. This proposed system would still be subject
to further deliberation during the next interim.
Still on the
regional front, the African Seed Trade Association (AFSTA)
reported a membership of 60 during the period under review of
whom 11 were from outside Africa. Its acceptability as mouth
piece for the African Seed Industry was evident by way of the
active participation of all major international seed-orientated
organizations. Apart from this, AFSTA was also invited to
participate in meetings of several other international and
regional organizations during this period.
During the
2003 AFSTA Congress harmonization of seed legislation continued
to be the most contentious issue dealt with. Africa is still in
the process of regional trade development, which, of course,
requires the harmonization of relevant legislation. Improved
availability of, as well as trade in improved seed could only be
realized if national trade barriers were overcome through
regional harmonization of appropriate legislation.
The national scenario included several issues during the period
under review. These included, amongst others, a continuation on
negotiations with the National Association of Maize Millers
(NAMM) on the alleged undesirability for milling purposes of
certain white maize cultivated varieties and/or hybrids;
negotiations with Grain South Africa on seed lot homogeneity
with regard to seed size; negotiations within the Groundnut
Forum on a workable alternative to prevent the relevant seed
scheme from total collapse; and extensive, industry-wide
negotiations on an acceptable model for the acquisition of more
reliable statistics on the South African seed industry.
Agri Inspec
recorded several successful prosecutions during the period under
review. No less than five cases led to admission of guilt
fines, while a further two were due for court appearances.
Other minor cases were concluded in an amicable manner and
transgressors let off with stern warnings.
The South
African Variety List was further streamlined as a handy spin off
of the Agri Inspec contract. This initiative has
significantly decreased the workload of Variety Control under
the auspices of the offices of the Registrars of Plant
Improvement and Plant breeders’ Rights and subsequently
facilitated the listing and/or registration of new varieties to
the benefit of all concerned.
Other issues handled included continued support to the Executive
Officer of Agricultural Pests in the national survey on the
possible spread of the quarantine fungus, Karnal Bunt, on
wheat seed; the investigation of revised minimum requirements
for certain sub-tropical grass species in co-operation with the
Registrar of Plant Improvement; the continuation of discussions
with senior management of the Agricultural Research Council
(ARC) on the revision of the current Memorandum of Understanding
with the ARC on the collection of royalties on their behalf; the
partial implementation of a new computerized database network
for seed certification; and the implementation of a South
African ISST (International Society of Seed Technologists)
Chapter.
During the period under review, SANSOR membership peaked at 112
members comprising 68 full members, 32 associate members, six
affiliate members and six honorary members.
The SANSOR Secretariat, under guidance of the SANSOR Board of
Directors, maintained the crucial approach that SANSOR
membership remained the lifeline of the organisation and all
functions and activities should continue to focus on common
needs and interests of members. The Secretariat was still
committed to strive for the strengthening of relationships with
Government, but acknowledged that stronger links would need to
be established with the ministry responsible for Trade &
Industry in particular. Support for its members in their quest
for improved service delivery to their primary client, the
farmers, however, would remain a priority. Finally the
Secretariat would continue with efforts to establish functional
networks with similar or related organisations, both nationally
and internationally.