The
Agronomy Division of SANSOR experienced quite a turbulent and
exciting 2002. A multitude of changes in both internal- and
external environments placed seed businesses in positions where
rapid decisions had to be made to maximize output, whilst
keeping costs at the minimum.Contrary to the previous period
under review, the local currency displayed a strong recovery
against the US Dollar. This strong recovery occurred in the
latter part of the year when most of the agronomy seed
businesses usually sell their products. This parity effect
caused a decline in grain prices on the one hand. On the other
hand, however, significant pressure was put on the production of
seed. Seed contracts were concluded during the time when the
grain prices were still extremely high, which inevitably would
lead to a high ‘cost of goods’ for seed. This would definitely
influence the price of seed in the 2003 selling season.
The genetic modification of agronomy crops was again placed
under the magnifying glass during 2002. A special meeting was
held and various stakeholders were invited to raise issues and
concerns concerning the biotechnology industry in South Africa.
Grain South Africa also convened a meeting concerning progress
in biotechnology in South Africa to which SANSOR was invited.
The main concern raised by stakeholders at both these meetings
was the fact that the European Union had a moratorium on
genetically modified crops and that this would negatively
influence the export markets for the South African grain
producers. The main issues discussed were the implementation of
an identity preservation (IP) system, the need for a quick and
reliable testing method for the presence of genetic modification
by means of modern biotechnology in grain, as well as the
labelling of foods derived from genetically modified organisms.
From these meetings the potential of a Forum for an open
exchange of views and concerns between all intended stakeholders
was suggested. It was also suggested that the lead should be
taken by SANSOR in this regard.
The debate concerning the release of a list of undesirable
white maize cultivars continued in 2002. Two meetings were held
between the National Association of Maize Millers (NAMM) and a
SANSOR delegation, which lead to a much more positive
relationship between these two role players. Several questions
were raised by SANSOR concerning the methods used by the
Agricultural Research Council (ARC) for the evaluation of
milling quality. The ARC undertook to consider these concerns.
The relevant issue was also discussed with the Grain South
Africa input-working group.
The availability of information concerning top selling
cultivated varieties and/or hybrids was once again a contentious
issue. Several requests for this information had been made by
Grain South Africa, as well as the National Department of
Agriculture. A decision was taken that the Secretariat should
once again engage in an effort to obtain the required
information from all the role-players on a classified,
confidential basis.
Table 1 reflects the updated market statistics for the year
2002 of the most important agronomy crops under the auspices of
the SANSOR Agronomy Division.
SOUTH AFRICAN SEED MARKET FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS - 2002