The
South African Seed Industry has shown consistent growth since
2000. During the period under review the Industry displayed a
turnover in excess of R1,3 milliard ( US$168 million). This was
made up primarily by winter and summer grain crops (73%),
vegetables (16%), pasture and forage species (9%), with flowers
accounting for less than 2%. This growth was also reflected in
the 8% growth in SANSOR membership during the period under
review. The contribution of major seed companies towards
research and development increased to approximately 10% during
this period and SANSOR welcomed its first member from emerging
agriculture during February 2003.The strengthening of the
local currency had a positive effect on the vegetable seed
industry and the SANSOR Horticulture Division subsequently
reported a favourable effect on seed prices for vegetable
producers. In the case of agronomy crops, however, most seed
contracts were concluded during a time when grain prices were
extremely high and this factor would inevitably lead to a
significant increase in seed price of the major agronomy crops
during the forthcoming season.
The World Summit on Sustainable Development, which was held
in Johannesburg during August 2002, was probably the most
important international event to report on from a political
point of view.
An important linkage for the seed industry was that the
understanding of sustainable development was broadened and
strengthened as a result of the Summit, particularly the
important linkages between poverty, the environment and the use
of natural resources.
A further important economic consideration was that the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) was identified for
special attention and support by the international community to
better focus efforts for addressing the development needs of
Africa.
The views of civil society were given prominence at the
Summit in recognition of the key role of civil society in
implementing the outcome and in promoting partnership
initiatives. Over 8,000 civil society participants attended the
Summit, reinforced by parallel events which included major
groups, such as, NGOs, women, indigenous people, youth, farmers,
trade unions, business leaders, the scientific and technological
community and local authorities as well as Chief Justices from
various countries.
The concept of partnerships between governments, business and
civil society was given a large boost by the Summit and the Plan
of Implementation. Over 220 partnerships (with $235 million in
resources) were identified in advance of the Summit and around
60 partnerships were announced during the Summit by a range of
countries.
SANSOR has recommended that the South African government
should sign and ratify the newly introduced Treaty on Plant
Genetic Resources for Food & Agriculture. This, however, had not
been finalized during the period under review. A total of 78
countries had signed the relevant Treaty by the close of the
initial deadline on 30 November 2002, while a total of 15
countries ratified, accepted, approved or acceded to the Treaty
by 28 February 2003. The Treaty would become effective on the
90th day after ratification by 40 countries of which at least 20
must be FAO members.
It was once again important to note that ratification would
be a prerequisite to form part of the Governing Body and to
subsequently have a say in the future destiny of the Treaty. As
an international legal instrument the Treaty is in general a
balanced compromise between the needs of industrial agriculture
and the aspirations of traditional agricultural practices and
there should be no reason why ratification would not be
concluded by the South African government in due course.
The latest update from the United Nations Environmental
Programme (UNEP) indicated that 103 countries had already signed
and/or ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. This
included 28 countries from Africa and adjoining island states.
This Protocol would also enter into force on the 90th day after
the date of deposit of the 50th instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession by states. At the time of
compilation of this report 44 states had already deposited such
instrument and these included 11 from Africa. Only six more
ratification were, therefore, needed before the Protocol would
come into force. South Africa, once again, had not yet ratified.
Other significant developments on the international front
included the approval by the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation & Development (OECD) of the notification given by
South Africa for future participation in the OECD experiment for
seed sampling (including fastening and labelling) and seed
analysis as from 1 May 2002. The aim of this experiment was to
incorporate a provision for the accreditation of
non-governmental seed samplers and -analysts into the Seed
Schemes of the OECD.
The success of this experiment would be crucial for the
broadening of international accreditation of organisations like
SANSOR for quality assurance in international seed trade.
During the past congress of the International Seed Trade
Federation (ISF) a regional approach was encouraged in an effort
to resolve certain tricky issues. SANSOR subsequently found
itself bogged down in an extremely anti-U.S. approach within the
Africa group, which was not necessarily in the best interest of
our local seed industry. This was, once again, nothing new in
international, agricultural trade politics and a popular means
for certain world economic powers to manipulate the achievement
of reasonable consensus. Apart from this incident, there were
also indications that economic powers outside the African region
were using the African Seed Trade Association (AFSTA) to promote
their own interests at the expense of intra-regional market
development.
On the regional front the harmonization of legislation was
once again the key issue for the private seed trade and two
action plans were proposed to the Southern Africa Development
Community’s (SADC) Seed Security Network (SSSN) for further
exploration. The first action plan would include the development
of a protocol for regional variety testing and registration, a
seed certification and quality system to integrate international
standards for certification and the harmonization of
phytosanitary standards and minimum requirements to move seed
across borders.
The second action plan, which of course was of major concern
to the South African seed industry, would deal with the need for
more regional integration on the discussion of intellectual
property rights (IPR) issues through SADC. In this regard, the
possible recommendation by SADC to member countries to introduce
the African Model Law on Intellectual Property Rights had been
opposed by SANSOR in its recommendation to government.
Still on the regional front, the African Seed Trade
Association (AFSTA) reported a membership of 57 during the
period under review of whom 10 were from outside Africa. Its
acceptability as spokes body for the African Seed Industry was
also evident by way of invitations to participate in meetings of
several other international and regional organizations during
this period.
The harmonization of seed legislation in the region was also
one of the most contentious issues dealt with by AFSTA during
the period under review. Progress reports from several regions
were discussed in this regard. East Africa displayed most
progress to date, which included the reduction of phytosanitary
requirements from 33 to three quarantine diseases. Similar
initiatives, supported by the Food & Agriculture Organization
(FAO), were underway in West and, as already mentioned, Southern
Africa.
The national scenario included several issues during the
period under review. These included, amongst others, extensive
negotiations with the National Association of Maize Millers
(NAMM) on the alleged undesirability for milling purposes of
certain white maize cultivated varieties and/or hybrids.
Although reasonable consensus had been reached in this regard,
constructive negotiations would be continued in the forthcoming
period.
The contract with Agri Inspec to investigate unethical
conduct in the seed trade proved to be beneficial in more ways
than one. During the period under review eight major cases were
investigated, of which three were registered as criminal cases.
A handy spin-off was the deletion of unnecessary or obsolete
varieties from the national variety list, as well as the
cancellation of outdated plant breeders’ rights due to the
funding mechanism implemented. This initiative significantly
reduced the workload for statutory Variety Control, as well as
facilitated the process to get new varieties listed and/or
registered for plant breeders’ rights. SANSOR once again
assisted the Directorate of Plant Health & Quality in a national
survey on the possible spread of the quarantine fungus,
Karnal Bunt, on wheat seed. Although all seed for
propagation purposes tested negative for spore contamination
during initial assessments, the Directorate reported indications
of contamination in a processing facility, where both wheat
grain and seed had been processed. Further assessments had been
initiated, but results were not available at the time of this
report.
Other issues handled included the investigation of revised
minimum requirements for certain subtropical grass species in
co-operation with the Registrar of Plant Improvement; the
initiation of discussions with senior management of the
Agricultural Research Council (ARC) on the revision of the
current Memorandum of Understanding with the ARC on the
collection of royalties on their behalf; the development of a
new computerized database network for seed certification; the
successful application of Chapter membership of the
International Society of Seed Technologists (ISST); and the
development of a new initiative for the recruitment of potential
seed experts from the emerging agricultural sector.
During the period under review, SANSOR membership peaked at
107 members comprising 66 full members, 32 associate members,
seven affiliate members and two honorary members.
The Secretariat maintained the crucial approach that SANSOR
membership was the lifeline of the organisation and all
functions and activities should remain focused on common needs
and interests of members. The Secretariat would further continue
to strive for the strengthening of relationships with
Government, the improvement of service delivery to its primary
client, the farmers and the establishment of functional networks
with similar or related organisations, both nationally and
internationally.